Audio RoundupLatest Essays

Audio Roundup 2025:39

by Joel Rich

Interesting in C”M 267 we see that originally a middling identification mark was considered sufficient to return a lost object. However, when tricksters became more numerous, the court determined that it would require witnesses as well.

It makes me wonder what caused the increase in tricksters and how perceived permanent had the increase to be in order to have required such an enactment. What were the causes? Could the causes be cultural, economic, God-fearingness levels, or something else altogether. What was the trigger event or level that made the court determine that this was a permanent change that needed a permanent enactment? I don’t think anybody knows the answer but this is a subset of a more general question about courts and subjectivity and when to intervene in the system which had existed from har sinai.


The rama in o”c 149:1 says it’s a mitzvah to accompany the sefer torah back to the aron. What mitzvah is it? at the end of the sif it records a minhag to bring children in to kiss the torah. How old should they be and did they just bring them in for this (and not for davening?)


Please direct any informal comments to [email protected].

Joel Rich

Joel Rich is a frequent wannabee cyberspace lecturer on various Torah topics. A Yerushalmi formerly temporarily living in West Orange, NJ, his former employer and the Social Security administration support his Torah listening habits. He is a recovering consulting actuary.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button